Fast company logo
|
advertisement

Labor-rights supporters like the Economic Policy Institute say states with RTW laws have lower unionization rates, wages, and benefits.

Michigan repealed its right-to-work law, and this data says it may help wages and unions

[Photo: RiverNorthPhotography/E+/Getty Images]

BY Sam Becker2 minute read

Almost a year after Michigan lawmakers voted to repeal the state’s “right-to-work” law, that repeal went into effect on Tuesday. The law, originally passed in 2013, allowed workers to opt out of paying dues to unions while still receiving benefits—effectively kneecapping unions, as workers no longer needed to pay to support them.

While right-to-work (RTW) laws are designed to give workers the choice of whether to join a union, they’re often used as a tool to weaken unions. These laws have been adopted in more than half of U.S. states.

With Michigan’s repeal, private-sector workers in unionized workplaces in the state will need to pay union dues, though there are some other variables in the mix. Right-to-work rules in Michigan cost unions more than $50 million in lost dues every year over the past decade, according to the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, a Michigan-based nonprofit policy group.

What impact will this have on the local economy?

The decision to repeal its right-to-work laws may have a positive economic effect—at least, that’s what a brief released this week from the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute (EPI) shows.

The report says that states with RTW laws “have lower unionization rates, wages, and benefits compared with non-RTW states,” and that “on average, workers in RTW states are paid 3.2% less than workers with similar characteristics in non-RTW states, which translates to $1,670 less per year for a full-time worker.”

Further, the report finds that union workers are more likely to benefit from employer-provided health and retirement benefits, and that overall, right-to-work laws generally tend to leave workers worse off, without creating job growth or economic stimulation—stymieing local economies, when it’s all said and done.

Accordingly, the brief’s authors argue that Michigan’s repeal of the law should help accelerate its economy—even as another state, New Hampshire, looks at passing a right-to-work law of its own. Notably, though, Michigan’s changes do not affect public-sector employees, and it’s unclear how much of an effect the repeal will have in the state.

Some groups are warning that there may be undesired effects. The Detroit Regional Chamber, in contrast to the EPI, says repealing right-to-work laws will not be a boon to the state, but rather will hurt it economically.

“[T]he repeal of Right to Work weakens Michigan’s global economic competitive position and harms our ability to vie for new businesses and jobs," a statement from the Chamber reads. "In reality, the Right to Work law has little impact on both unions and businesses—businesses that are union shops continue to partner with unions and only a small percentage of union workers opt out of paying dues.”

Recognize your brand’s excellence by applying to this year’s Brands That Matter Awards before the early-rate deadline, May 3.

ModernCEO Newsletter logo
A refreshed look at leadership from the desk of CEO and chief content officer Stephanie Mehta
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Privacy Policy

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Sam Becker is a freelance writer and journalist based near New York City. He is a native of the Pacific Northwest, and a graduate of Washington State University, and his work has appeared in and on Fortune, CNBC, TIME, and more. More


Explore Topics