Fast company logo
|
advertisement

It takes a conscious and intentional effort.

How to stop inadvertent age discrimination in your hiring process

[Photo: filipefrazao/iStock]

BY Stav Ziv and The Muse8 minute read

Take a look around your office for a moment and think back to all the new employees you can remember joining the company since you started. You might’ve already become attuned to how many women or people of color are being hired (or perhaps, not being hired).

But what about these newbies’ ages? Is almost every single one of them a recent college graduate? Are even the more senior and management roles being filled by shooting stars in their 20s, 30s, and mayyyybe 40s? Would you literally have to go two floors up to find someone over 50 and exit the building to find someone over 60?

“By avoiding older workers, employers are missing out on workers with the most experience, who are likely to stay with companies longer than their younger counterparts, who usually understand the ethic of work and the cultures of workplaces, and who are likely to reward your faith with strong motivation to excel,” says Ruth Finkelstein, Executive Director of the Brookdale Center for Healthy Aging and a professor of urban public health at Hunter College. With age as with other characteristics, she adds, “the research is clear: diverse work teams are more successful as they incorporate multiple perspectives.”

While federal and state laws prohibit age discrimination in hiring and other aspects of employment, ageism is incredibly common. A 2018 AARP survey of 3,900 workers ages 45 and above found that 45% of older workers cite age discrimination as a major reason they believe they wouldn’t be able to find another job quickly (and an additional 31% said it was a minor reason), and 16% reported that they’d personally been passed up for a new job they applied for because of their age. And several studies (like this one and this one) have proven, empirically, that age discrimination is a problem in hiring.

But “formal complaints are rarely filed, and even more rarely proven,” Finkelstein explains. And a 2015 survey by PricewaterhouseCoopers found that only 8% of organizations addressed or planned to address age as a dimension of diversity and inclusion in their talent strategies.

“Everyone knows it happens every day but hardly anyone does anything about it,” says Cathy Ventrell-Monsees, senior advisor to the chair of the EEOC and co-author of Age Discrimination Litigation. “Our society is pretty ageist,” she explains. “People have to recognize that and work to break down the assumptions they may have and may not know they have.”

If you’re involved in hiring–whether you’re a recruiter who spends all your days focused on finding new talent, a manager searching for a fantastic new addition to your team, or a coworker taking part in the interview process–and want to make an effort not only to avoid illegal age discrimination, but also to push for and benefit from age diversity, here are several ways you can go about it.

1. Make sure any plan for diverse hiring includes age

As the PwC study found, very few companies include age as a component of their talent diversity and inclusion strategies. But “if you don’t have age on your radar screen, how do you address the issues?” says Patricia Barnes, an expert on employment discrimination and author of Overcoming Age Discrimination in Employment: An Essential Guide for Workers, Advocates, and Employers. “Maybe the first thing a company should do is do an evaluation. What are we doing with respect to older workers?” she says. “If we’re doing nothing we’re making the problem worse.”

So if you have a formal or informal plan around diversity in hiring, make sure age is part of it. Because it’ll do good not only for older workers who will have more opportunities, but also for the companies and colleagues they join. In a 2018 report released on the 50th anniversary of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, for example, the EEOC pointed to research that’s shown that age diversity leads to better organizational performance, higher productivity for everyone involved, and lower turnover.

Older workers bring industry and business knowledge and a wealth of experience that helps them strategize and solve problems, Barnes says. And they “can mentor younger workers, if not technically, then in valuable interpersonal skills and teamwork,” she adds. “Someone once said those who don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Older workers bring the equivalent of wisdom capital to a job.”

2. Pay attention to your job descriptions

You may already know that certain language used in job descriptions can deter women from applying–research points to words like “competitive,” “dominant,” and even “outspoken,” and we’ve also heard too much about “ninjas” and “rock stars.”

You’ll also want to think about whether the words you’re using will deter older workers. If you’re advertising for “digital natives,” that’s language that explicitly leaves people out just because they happened to be born at a certain time. If what you’re after is proficiency in certain digital skills or a proven track record adopting and mastering new tools, talk about that instead.

But that’s not the only kind of language that might turn off potential older applicants, according to Finkelstein. “When it’s all full of ‘energetic, fresh ideas, bold, etc.,’ it’s not that experienced workers aren’t those things, it’s that older workers read an ad like that and say, ‘Oh they want to hire kids,'” she explains. When, on the other hand, an ad “emphasizes mentoring, training, leading, and autonomy, then older workers read that and think their applications might be considered.”

Another easy fix: Avoid setting a cap when you lay out how much experience you expect candidates to have. Sure, you can indicate a minimum, if you believe someone needs at least that much time in a similar role to excel in the position. But an upper limit does more to turn away older applicants than filter for those who could do the job well.

If you’re trying to use that number as a roundabout way to set salary expectations, consider your other options. Laurie McCann, a senior attorney with the AARP Foundation, suggests being direct and simply posting the salary instead. “Then the individual worker decides before applying whether or not that salary is acceptable to them.” If that’s not an option at your company, then make sure you “clearly describe the skills required and the level of responsibility the position wields—in other words describe the position as clearly and accurately as possible so that there is no miscommunication about the type of job you are hiring for.”

As Barnes notes, “if an industry is shrinking or the economy is down, the hiring pool will likely include some highly qualified people. Workers have many reasons for accepting lower salaries (i.e., to keep working in the profession they love or because they want to work in a particular locale or whatever). That’s the reality today.”

advertisement

3. Don’t ask for birth dates or graduation years (and don’t limit your search to recent grads)

Here’s another easy one: Don’t ask applicants for their dates of birth or college graduation years (which is just another indicator of age). “It’s amazing how frequently we see that,” says Ventrell-Monsees of the EEOC.

Often those fields don’t just appear on the online application, they’re also required, which means that if you don’t complete them, you can’t hit submit. Sometimes, Ventrell-Monsees says, the college graduation question is even accompanied by a dropdown menu that doesn’t list options before a certain year, as though it would be inconceivable for an applicant to be older than that. And if it’s a required field, a candidate’s only option is to select an incorrect year or walk away entirely.

Similarly, avoid limiting your pool of qualified applicants by marking certain jobs for recent grads or, as a recruiter, filtering potential candidates by graduation year in your LinkedIn search. It’s the same idea as putting an arbitrary cap on years of experience–and by proxy, age–rather than focusing on skills a candidate would actually need to succeed in the role.

4. Target your outreach to workers of all ages

College and graduate school career fairs may seem like some of the most obvious ways to recruit new employees, but make sure those aren’t the only places you’re looking. These events may be convenient suppliers of high volumes of candidates, but for obvious reasons, most of them will fall into a pretty narrow age group.

Similarly, if your company is buying job ads on platforms like Facebook and Google, is it limiting who sees those ads to particular age groups? An investigation by ProPublica found several instances of large companies placing recruitment ads that would be shown only to particular age groups.

Finkelstein also urges employers who are serious about age diversity to specifically seek out older candidates. “You can think about proactive recruitment things as well as things that prevent discrimination,” she says.

“When I’m posting for a position and I explicitly am looking for a deep wide range of expertise, I go to the HR people and say, ‘Someone in their 60s, someone in their 70s, would be good in this job,'” Finkelstein says, almost as permission as well as a reminder and encouragement to consider candidates who are older.

She also recommends turning to alumni networks and, especially at larger companies, to retiree networks. “Your retirees are an excellent source of recruits,” she says. “They know other people in their peer group or one just below them who are looking for work,” she adds, and because they’re familiar with the company, “they’re good judges of who would be a good fit.”


A version of this article originally appeared on The Muse and is reprinted with permission. 

Recognize your brand’s excellence by applying to this year’s Brands That Matter Awards before the early-rate deadline, May 3.

WorkSmarter Newsletter logo
Work Smarter, not harder. Get our editors' tips and stories delivered weekly.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Privacy Policy

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Stav Ziv is a journalist based in New York City whose work has also appeared in The Forward, Dance Magazine, The Atlantic, and Newsday. She was previously a staff writer at Newsweek and the deputy editor overseeing careers and work coverage at The Muse More


Explore Topics