Fast company logo
|
advertisement

Many leaders dislike such lists, but they serve an important purpose.

In defense of female ‘power rankings’

[Source illustration: discan/Getty Images]

BY Stephanie Mehta2 minute read

Hello and welcome to Modern CEO! I’m Stephanie Mehta, CEO and chief content officer of Mansueto Ventures. Each week this newsletter explores inclusive approaches to leadership drawn from conversations with executives and entrepreneurs, and from the pages of Inc. and Fast Company. Sign up to get it yourself every Monday morning.


“I’m looking forward to the day when we don’t need these lists.”

Over the years, countless executives, mostly women, have told me they dislike lists that highlight the most successful or admired women in business. Some don’t like the seemingly arbitrary nature of power rankings—an art more than science, to be sure—while others pine for the day when workplace equality has taken hold so firmly that it isn’t necessary to call out women sitting atop major global corporations or launching billion-dollar companies.

The case for rankings

I’m an unabashed fan of women’s lists, and I firmly believe there will always be a place for them, even after we reach parity in startup funding and in the C-suite. (And let’s face it, that’s going to take a while.)

These lists are interesting and full of discovery—in part because there aren’t as many women in business who are household names. Earlier this month, Inc. unveiled its Female Founders 200, highlighting accomplished entrepreneurs across more than two dozen industries. The list is full of smart, creative up-and-comers and established leaders I’d love to meet.

I’m not alone. At Inc. and Fast Company, we hear all the time about how financiers scour our lists for potential investments or acquisitions, which is another reason to champion women’s power lists. Female-only founded companies received less than 2% of venture funding in 2022. If editorial packages such as Female Founders 200 help unlock access to capital for its honorees, that’s a good thing.

Strength in numbers

Women’s advancement doesn’t obviate the need for lists such as the ones produced by Inc., Fortune, Forbes, and other titles. As the number of high-impact women grows, the women on these lists will turn to these lists to find and help one another. I’ve seen firsthand the fruits of bringing together powerful women: They immediately start sharing advice and recommendations for bankers, lawyers, coaches, and more. They form formal and informal mentoring groups. They put each other up for board positions and jobs. I hope I never hear someone say, “I’m looking forward to the day when we don’t need women’s networks.”

Have your say

How do you feel about women’s lists—or conferences? (For a contrary take, check out Sheelah Kolhatkar’s critique of female empowerment events.) Send me your thoughts at stephaniemehta@mansueto.com.

Read, listen, and watch: women in power

Meet 50 LGBTQ women and nonbinary innovators. Read more

On being a female founder in the age of Instagram. Read more

Lena Waithe and Eva Longoria talk entrepreneurship. Watch here

Kendra Scott’s “sister rule.” Listen here

Recognize your brand’s excellence by applying to this year’s Brands That Matter Awards before the early-rate deadline, May 3.

WorkSmarter Newsletter logo
Work Smarter, not harder. Get our editors' tips and stories delivered weekly.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Privacy Policy

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Stephanie Mehta is chief executive officer and chief content officer of Mansueto Ventures, publisher of Inc. and Fast Company. She previously served as editor-in-chief of Fast Company, where she oversaw digital, print, and live journalism More


Explore Topics