With the death of design icon Virgil Abloh, we remember his rise, his output, and his perspective that creativity was not to be siloed within the bounds of any one medium.
The man was impossibly prolific at his label Off-White and as an artistic director at Louis Vuitton, completing a lifetime of work in little more than a decade. Yet for whatever reason, in this moment, I can’t stop circling back to one of Abloh’s patterns that I’d long stopped seeing in the shadow of his fame: his use of quotes.
As a designer, Abloh will be remembered for many motifs, and few were subtle. He added giant Xs and diagonal stripes to clothing, noting that the icon made them unmistakable across social media. He added prominent zip ties to shoes—a brand signature that was notably removable, so someone could put it on any other shoe, ostensibly turning any stray pair into their very own Abloh collab.
We saw these quotes labeling all sorts of items that Abloh touched, from apparel and accessories to his brand collaborations. An Off-White “scarf.” A Nike “Air” Jordan. The short answer to why he did this is simple. Abloh’s goal was often to redesign objects with as little design as possible (sometimes this was called the 3% rule). And by using quotation marks, Abloh practiced redesign judo. With minimal intervention—just a couple of marks around a word—Abloh forced us to reevaluate an object. The object itself became an “object,” if you will.
Quotes transformed anything Abloh touched into a Readymade. Consider how Abloh handled his collaboration with Ikea. He didn’t actually need to craft a giant Ikea receipt rug to call out Ikea as an irresistible capitalist phenomenon. All he really had to do was label an Ikea store “Ikea” to make that same point. That’s the disarming power of a quote.
When I talked to Abloh in 2019—during the launch of his Nike store in Chicago and the opening of his Figures of Speech exhibit down the street at the MCA—I brought up how his use of quotes ranged from ironic to sincere, and from superficial to disarming.
“It’s a device, it’s a contextualization of a word without getting into the design. It was always meant for that,” he said. “I can be literal and figurative at the same time, or not.”
“[Quoting] automatically makes you question whether that’s the right definition, so to speak. It opens up possibilities for questioning, for reimagining,” says Michael Darling, James W. Alsdorf chief curator of the MCA who worked closely with Abloh during the creation of the artist’s 2019 show. “It turns everything into a meta conversation. So it’s not just a ‘hat.’ It’s a hat in the broader scheme of hats, or whatever it might be.”
“He was still almost an outsider at that point, riffing on the pinnacle of luxury,” Darling says. ” I think it makes you question if that’s really a Louis Vuitton piece or not. It taps into piracy culture, full of cheap knockoffs—he really appreciated bad knockoffs, and how amazing they could be when they were really bad.”
Of course, “Lewis Vuitton” is also just a funny, adolescent joke. What is “Lewis” but the spelling equivalent to an air quote of “Louis”? Darling points out that this one misspelled brand name hints at Abloh’s theory on tourism versus purism in design: that a tourist is a wide-eyed outsider who appreciates a topic with wonder, while a purist is the insider who knows everything on a topic, perhaps to the point where the path to enjoyment becomes too overwrought. (Abloh saw himself embodying both extremes. He was, both figuratively and literally, Lewis Vuitton.)
At times, Abloh even took to using quotes as his literal signature—he’d sign customized Jordans with a permanent marker for his friends, writing anything from his name to the sorts of slogans you might expect on an ironic T-shirt, like “Hate Instagram” or “For Red Carpet Only.” You’re meant to hate Instagram with a shoe designed by someone who claimed he was famous because he “made Instagram [his] magazine.” Or don a Jordan for a formal occasion? Yes, these were ironies. Yet they might also be read as sincere statements, meant to be taken at face value. Instagram is superficial and hateable! Abloh did make Jordans runway-worthy. These clashing ideologies create a spinning vortex of ambiguity about the purpose of the objects themselves, and the place we ascribe them in our lives.
Whatever you see, or don’t see, in Abloh’s use of quotes, I would argue that his playful ambiguity never got in the way of one serious meaning. Because when Abloh wrote “Ikea” it no longer belonged to Ikea, much like Nike “Air” no longer belonged to Nike. With a few subtle dabs of ink, these things became Abloh’s. They “belonged” to him.
Recognize your company's culture of innovation by applying to this year's Best Workplaces for Innovators Awards before the final deadline, April 5.