advertisement
advertisement

Mail-in voting is widely accessible. State voting websites are not

More than 20 states have terrible websites for people with mobility issues. Ordering a ballot needs to be easier.

Mail-in voting is widely accessible. State voting websites are not
[Source Images: Veronika Zimina/iStock, Suljo/iStock]

Mail-in voting will be absolutely essential this year as the pandemic is still in full swing. And for many of us, requesting a ballot is fairly easy. You just go to your state’s website and order one.

advertisement
advertisement

But if you’re one of five Americans with a disability—ranging from color blindness to severe mobility limitations—it’s not necessarily that easy, even online. Because a recent analysis that tested the accessibility of all 50 states’ mail-in voting sites discovered something terrible: The average accessibility score was 77%, or what you might think of as a C+. Some outright failed, such as Alaska and Georgia, which each scored 20%. In fact, 20 states scored somewhere between a C and an F.

What is going on? It seems to be a product not just of carelessness, but perhaps of too much reliance on automated testing tools.

The study was spearheaded by Catharine McNally, accessibility lead at the digital agency Phase2, who published her results on Medium. McNally herself relies on a cochlear implant to hear and is used to encountering accessibility problems not just in her professional life, but in her daily life too. As she puts it with a laugh, “Don’t assume I can use ASL because I’m deaf. I don’t know ASL—find different options for communication!”

Vote.Utah.Gov – tabbing misses most content. [Image: courtesy Phase2]
And that’s really the point of accessible design—also sometimes called universal design. You can’t create just one perfect interface for a single type of user. Instead, you need to use best practices to include the more nuanced edge cases, too. Maybe someone can’t use a mouse, so they rely on hitting “tab” on their keyboard to hop around the page. Or maybe someone can’t see, so they rely on speech software to read labeled parts of the page aloud.

[Image: courtesy Phase2]
But what if the tabs don’t work right on a page—as they don’t on 46% of the state voting sites? Or what if boxes where you type your name or address aren’t labeled, so the speech software doesn’t have anything to read—as on 20% of the state voting sites? Those users become stuck. The website just doesn’t work for them.

“I want states to realize, a lot of accessibility issues are just about being aware of one line of code,” says McNally. “That is everything to somebody else who needs that.”

advertisement

Connecticut tabbing [Image: courtesy Phase2]
But McNally doesn’t want to lead some takedown of poor-performing states, shaming them for these errors, especially understanding that government budgets can be tight. She just wants to see the problems fixed. And she realizes, there’s a good reason they may have slipped by in the first place.

Click here for a larger version. [Image: courtesy Phase2]
When McNally first analyzed the state voting sites, using an industry-standard automated accessibility tool developed by Google called Lighthouse, they passed with flying colors. The average score was 90%. But then she went through each page manually. With help from the team, she did simple but intentional labor: She hit the tab button to test if it worked. She read forms and spotted where designers had used the color green to convey meaning in headers (a big no-no, since 1 in 12 men are colorblind). Green and red in particular can often be mixed up, but ultimately, color alone should never be used to signal something’s importance—such as the blue that’s often used to mark a hyperlink. Hyperlinks should also be bolded so that everyone can distinguish them.

Bold helps do what color can’t. [Image: courtesy Phase2]
Labeling. Tabbing. And not relying too much on color. These are easy-to-discern problems when you’re looking for them, but invisible if you’re not.

“Alaska was in really bad shape. But they have an 80% Lighthouse score. Georgia has a 90% pass rate in Lighthouse but a 20% [from manual testing],” says McNally. “That’s a shining example of how automated testing isn’t good enough.” Indeed, tools like Lighthouse can only flag up to 30% of all errors, according to most industry experts. The others fall through the massive cracks.

But there is good news. After publishing her findings, a few states reached out to her directly, seeking her advice to make repairs. She’s currently working on a report for the state of Colorado, at its request.

“I want to help these states,” says McNally. “Because we have to make sure everyone has the access and opportunity to vote.”

advertisement
advertisement

About the author

Mark Wilson is a senior writer at Fast Company who has written about design, technology, and culture for almost 15 years. His work has appeared at Gizmodo, Kotaku, PopMech, PopSci, Esquire, American Photo and Lucky Peach

More