advertisement
advertisement

$600 unemployment: If Congress lets it expire, it won’t be pretty, says JPMorgan Chase Institute

$600 unemployment: If Congress lets it expire, it won’t be pretty, says JPMorgan Chase Institute
[Photo: Sharon McCutcheon/Unsplash]

The extra $600 per week in unemployment benefits that was part of the COVID-19 CARES Act passed in March 2020 did more than just help the recently unemployed stay afloat. It helped stimulate the economy, too. That’s according to a finding from a study done by the JPMorgan Chase Institute.

advertisement

The study looked at the spending patterns of two groups of people during the initial phase of the pandemic: households that were employed and households that lost employment but began receiving the extra $600-per-week unemployment benefit. What the study found was that though average spending for all households decreased during the period, “unemployed households actually increased their spending beyond pre-unemployment levels once they began receiving benefits.”

Matter of fact, the study found that while aggregate spending of the employed was down by 10% during the initial months of the pandemic, spending by people on the unemployment benefit increased by 10%.

As JPMorgan Chase Institute notes, this shows the extra $600 in unemployment benefits was an overall positive for the economy. “The fact that spending by benefit recipients rose during the pandemic instead of falling, like in normal times, suggests that the $600 supplement has helped households to smooth consumption and stabilized aggregate demand,” the institution said.

The bad news is, that extra unemployment benefit is scheduled to end later this month. If that happens, the institute says, “that expiration will result in large spending cuts, with potentially negative effects on both households and macroeconomic activity.”

Instead of letting the benefits expire, the institute argues that their results “underscore the importance of making unemployment benefits broadly available and bolstering states’ ability to process claims promptly.”

In other words, Congress shouldn’t let the benefits expire—for the good of not just the claimants, but state and local economies as well.

This story has been updated.

advertisement
advertisement