Visualizing where rich and poor people really cross paths--or don't

The two coffee shops occupy the exact same block in Boston. Yet while they’re just a couple minutes walk apart, each serves a different mix of clientele. The first spot caters to people from many different income brackets, but the second caters almost exclusively to people with lower-income levels.

That’s an example of “place inequality”–a metric that measures how people of different income, rich and poor alike, tend to cluster in some public spots either because they feel more comfortable there (or perhaps are excluded elsewhere).

[Screen capture: Atlas of Inequality]

It’s an idea that’s hard to visualize unless you can see it on a map. So MIT Media Lab collaborated with the location intelligence firm Cuebiq to build one. The result is called the Atlas of Inequality and harvests the anonymized location data from 150,000 people who opted in to Cuebiq’s Data For Good Initiative to track their movement for scientific research purposes. After isolating the general area (based on downtime) where each subject lived, MIT Media Lab could estimate what income bracket they occupied. The group then used data from a six-month period between late 2016 and early 2017 to figure out where these people traveled, and how their paths overlapped.

The result is an interactive view of just how filtered, sheltered, or sequestered many people’s lives really are. That’s an important thing to be reminded of at a time when the U.S. feels increasingly ideologically and economically divided. “Economic inequality isn’t just limited to neighborhoods, it’s part of the places you visit every day,” the researchers say in a mission statement about the Atlas.

As the Atlas’s instructions make clear, users can zoom in to see color-coded representations clustered at different coffee shops, movie theatres, stores, and restaurants around the city. (More than 30,000 places were identified by using a public application programming interface from FourSquare.)

Take, for instance, the coffee shop, which is called out in a section examining “stories” the groups uncovered. “Through these choices we build our habits and routines,” the researchers write. “The fact that our routines decide where we spend our time also means they decide who we spend our time with.” Providing people with a tool to recognize that is a good thing. Perhaps businesses and cities alike will see the benefit of building more intentionally inclusive spaces which within everyone can interact.

Video

Impact

Watch a surfer shred in the postapocalyptic wetsuit of the future

Long-distance electric buses are coming to the U.S.

Don’t build new renewable energy in California. Build it in the upper Midwest first

Creativity

‘The Last Kids on Earth’ leaps from books to Netflix to toys. Next stop: billion-dollar franchise

HBO Max is not (just) HBO. But it does look a lot like cable

The unbelievable timeline of how Benioff and Weiss went from ‘Game of Thrones’ gods to ‘Star Wars’ goats

Co.Design

Studio Gang’s 40 Tenth Ave. building looks like pieces have been cut off of it—for good reason

A museum’s new collection celebrates the art of African American quilting

Before you vape, check out this terrifying infographic

Work Life

How proximity bias holds employees (and workplaces) back

This is how journaling can make you a more effective leader

Why it’s better to be efficient rather than productive