GM has a vested interest in the electric vehicle industry–the company pioneered the sector in 1996 with the EV1, the Chevy Volt extended range EV is one of the most prominent electric cars on the market, and a plug-in hybrid Cadillac is also coming down the line. So it made sense that the company decided to sponsor California’s AB475, a bill that would restrict EV charger-equipped parking spots to EVs or plug-in hybrids (in the past, only pure EVs could occupy the spots), giving Volts a prime place to charge. But at some point, something went awry, and now GM is at odds with Plug-In America, an electric and hybrid car advocacy group that says AB475 will hurt EV drivers.
Ever since 2002, California electric vehicle owners that want to juice up in parking spaces equipped with charge spots have been required to display a DMV sticker proving that they actually have a zero-emissions vehicle. AB475 aims to simplify the process by nixing the DMV stickers and allowing the parking spots to be used “for the exclusive purpose of charging and parking a vehicle that is connected for electric charging purposes.” This means that plug-in hybrids can also use the spots–but Plug-In America worries that such loose wording will allow all sorts of cars to take up the spaces with charging ruses.
“Cars from northern states that have block
heaters could plug in. I have seen cases in the recent past where
someone has literally parked their car at an EV charger, tossed an extension cord
out of the hood and plugged in because they wanted the parking space,” says Jay Friedland, Legislative Director of Plug-In America, who opposes the bill as it’s currently written.
GM says that this simply isn’t the case. “The charging equipment [features] a standard connector, and you can only plug in electric vehicles for charging a battery,” says GM representative Shad Balch. And unless people are seriously desperate for parking spots, chances are that they won’t bother to plug in their gas-powered vehicles in an EV space.
One of Plug-In America’s other accusations is far more damning. The group notes that under AB475, every vehicle parked in a designated EV spot must be plugged in to a charger at all times. This means that two parking spots can’t share a charger, and that an unplugged EV parked in a charger-equipped space could be towed. In many places, the law could diminish the EV charging infrastructure.
“For years, plug-in advocates have used this method for vehicle
charging–you put the charger between two parking spaces so when someone is done
charging they can move the cord to the other vehicle. You can survive with half the amount of infrastructure,” argues Friedland.
GM admits that nixing shared chargers is part of the law, but claims that is a feature, not a bug, and part of planning for an all-electric world. “The idea of plug-sharing works well when there are a small number of EVs on the
road and there is a community protocol, but with tens of thousands of EVs coming, we will
run into issues of tampering and unplugging,” says Balch.
But GM must have thought at one time that Plug-In America’s complaints had some merit. Up until recently, GM and Plug-In America were working together on revising the bill’s language. “We proposed multiple alternatives, and GM told us last week that they were all
acceptable, but then they decided to push it through. It took a lot of us
by surprise,” explains Friedland.
The bill has passed through the state assembly and senate and is currently awaiting the governor’s signature. If the bill goes through, Plug-In America plans to fight to change the language. But as Friedland notes, “you never want a law to go into place that is clearly broken in some ways.”
[Image: GE ]