This morning’s massive 8.9-magnitude earthquake and deadly tsunami in Japan resulted in a slew of headlines
about the environmental havoc-wreaking power of the upcoming
“supermoon.” But in fact, given the moon’s current position, its effects
on earthly tides should be at their least. Here’s where the reports went
Where did the term supermoon originate?
According to AccuWeather blogger Mark Paquette,
the term “supermoon” originated on the website of astrologer Richard
Nolle. Paquette said in early March that a new or full moon at 90% or
more of its closest perigee (the point in the orbit nearest to the center of the earth) qualifies
as a supermoon. That makes the March 19 full moon a supermoon, because
the crest of the moon’s full phase comes within an hour of the moon’s
closest point to Earth.
Here’s what’s true–and false–about the moon on March 19.
False: The Japanese earthquake on March 11 is an example of a supermoon causing earthly effects. Not
only is this untrue, the March 11 moon shows exactly the opposite,
since the moon is not particularly close to Earth on March 11, nor is it
full or new moon (aligned with the sun and Earth). In fact, the moon on
March 11 is close to first quarter–at a right angle to the Earth/sun
line. Thus–according to the supermoon-earthquake connection theory–the
moon’s effect on earthly water and solid rock tides should be at its
False: The last times the full moon was at perigee were 1955, 1974, 1992 and 2005.
Not so. Full moon and perigee closely realign more often than that – in
periods of a little more than 413 days (about 1 year 1 month and 18
days). There are, of course, differences in how closely the full moon
aligns with the moon’s closest point to Earth for the month. On March
19, 2011, there is about an hour difference between the full moon and
perigee. On July 21, 2005, the difference was about 9 hours.
False: A supermoon caused the December 26, 2004 tsunami in Indonesia.
It did not. We all remember the devastating earthquake in the Indian
Ocean that day. It created a tsunami that plowed into coastlines and
caused the deaths of more than 200,000 people. The December 2004 tsunami
was especially deadly along the coast of Indonesia. In terms of loss of
life, it was the worst tsunami in recorded
history. There was a full moon that day, but it was not a supermoon. In
fact, the moon on the day of the 2004 Indonesian tsunami was nearly its
farthest from Earth. The moon was closest two weeks later on January 10,
True: Some astrologers and even astronomers are using the term “supermoon” to describe the March 19, 2011 full moon.
What makes it super is that–on the day of the March 2011 full
moon–the moon will also be closest to Earth for the month. The March 19
full moon will be 221,567 miles from Earth, in contrast to the moon’s
average distance of about 239,000 miles. No full moon will be this close
to Earth again until November 14, 2016.
The moon is full
every month, and there is a connection between full moon and earthly
tides. At full moon, the sun, Earth, and moon lie more or less along a
line in space. At these times, the gravity of the sun and moon are
reinforcing each other. That’s why, every month around the time of full
moon, people along the coast experience maximum high (and low) tides
known as spring tides. Actually, there are two spring tides each month, one at full moon and the other at new moon, as shown in the illustration below.
What does this mean for the March 11 moon? Not a thing. On March 11,
2011, the moon is not particularly close to Earth, nor is it aligned
with the Earth and sun.
A word about the tides
Halfway between each new and full moon – at the first and last quarter
moon phase – the sun and moon are at right angles as seen from Earth.
Then the sun’s gravity is working against the gravity of the moon, as
the moon pulls on the sea. This is the neap tide: the tide’s range is at
There is about a seven-day interval between spring tides and neap tides.
Supermoons and disasters
The March 19, 2011 full moon is a close one. That’s absolutely true. A
close full or new moon does connect– regularly, frequently,
cyclically–with greatest tidal maximums and minimums known as spring
tides. That is also true.
However, the March 11, 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan occurred
when the moon was near first quarter, and not particularly close to Earth.
March 11, 2011 should be a time of neap tides–or least tidal
range–not at a time of high spring tides. The March 11 moon is not an
example of a supermoon.
I first heard about a possible connection between a supermoon and
earthly disasters from a website called Psychic Connection. It predicted
“severe weather patterns, increased seismic activity, tsunamis and more
volcanic eruptions than normal.”
In my 40 years of writing about the sky, I’ve never heard of a
connection between full moons and severe weather. Can’t comment on that
There are mentions in the scientific literature of a possible connection
between full moons and geologic activity. The moon does indeed cause
tides in the solid body of Earth, just as it causes ocean tides. So it’s
logical to assume an especially close full moon might cause geologic
activity to increase, and occasionally I’ve seen random (dare I say
“fringe?”) studies suggesting this connection. In reality, is the
connection between the moon and geologic activity a strong one? I’ve
never seen a study showing a striking pattern between close full moons
and increased geologic activity.
Will the March 19, 2011 full
moon–which coincides with the moon’s closest point to Earth–bring more
earthquakes and tsunamis? Will it cause volcanic eruptions? Let me ask
another question first. Why, I wonder, do people want to believe in unfounded predictions for disasters?
The moon’s distance from Earth is changing continually. The full moon on
March 19 will be a close one, but there’s no scientific evidence it
will cause any of those events. The March 11 moon does not prove the
supermoon-earthquake theory. In fact, it disproves it. Plus we know of
closer full moons than the March 19 moon that did no harm.
Will the March 19, 2011 close full moon cause floods? Yes, that’s
different. Now we’re on more solid ground. Close full moons do cause
maximum tidal ranges. So if a storm moves into a coastline on the day a
full moon is closest, it can cause flooding along that coast. If you
live along a coast, and a storm is heading your way on or around March
19…expect possible flooding and take precautions.
I don’t believe science knows everything. Clearly, it doesn’t. But we
live in a complicated world, a world that features gobs of
misinformation flying willy-nilly on the Interwebs, terrifying people at
every turn. So – I believe – it’s important to separate fact from
fiction. The March 19, 2011 supermoon is interesting, but it’s no reason
to think that more earthly disasters are looming on the near horizon.
Better to focus instead on what’s really important now–looking to the
reality of the March 11, 2011 8.9-magnitude earthquake in Japan and
subsequent tsunami in the Pacific–and responding with our hopes,
prayers and support.
Deborah Byrd is Founder and President of EarthSky, which she created in
1991. She has won a galaxy of awards from the broadcasting and science
communities, including having an asteroid named 3505 Byrd in her honor.
She’s Editor-in-Chief of all EarthSky websites, including EarthSky.org
and EarthSky en Español. She serves on EarthSky’s Editorial Board and
leads EarthSky’s community on Facebook. She oversees and helps host
EarthSky’s science podcast series – now in 90-second, 60-second,
8-minute, 22-minute audio formats, and in video – in English and Spanish
with 20 or so new EarthSky science podcasts released every Monday to
1,200+ broadcast outlets, and heard on a variety of online platforms
each week including iTunes and Odeo. A science communicator and educator
for 30+ years, Byrd believes in science as a force for good in the
world and as a vital tool for the 21st century. Astrophysics, the night
sky and imagining space travel are among her most enduring lifelong
Read more coverage of the Japan earthquake.