The Problem With Carbon Capture: CO2 Doesn’t Always Stay Captured

Carbon capture and storage (CCS), a catch-all term for technology that captures carbon emissions from industrial plants and buries them undergrounds, is controversial for a number of reasons. It’s expensive, unproven, and according to researchers at Duke University, there’s the troubling possibility that captured carbon could leak into groundwater aquifers, potentially rendering water undrinkable.

The New York Times reports that Duke University researchers gathered samples of dry sediments from groundwater aquifers near potential CCS sites in Maryland, Virginia, Texas and Illinois and exposed the sediments to water solutions infused with large concentrations of CO2. The result: the “groundwater” showed increased acidity, and concentrations of iron, cadmium, cobalt zinc, and other metals increased by over 1,000 percent–in some cases, exceeding safe drinking water standards.

This doesn’t mean that CCS should be abandoned altogether. Duke’s Green Grok blog explains:

There should be careful monitoring of groundwater in areas where CO2 is
being stored. Such monitoring would provide an “early detection of …
leaks” that could presumably lead to remedial action to prevent serious
drinking water contamination. Quite reasonable but I suspect that Little
and Jackson’s results will provide fodder for the NIMBY opponents of
CCS when the coal industry comes knocking on their door looking for
storage sites. Like I said: the future of “clean” coal is murky.

Clean coal’s future may be murky, but coal-powered plants aren’t going anywhere. Neither is clean coal– the U.S. Department of Energy’s infamous FutureGen clean coal project is on track to be built in Meredosia, Illinois. Let’s hope that FutureGen carefully monitors groundwater, lest the project poison both local residents and CCS’s reputation.

Ariel Schwartz can be reached on Twitter or by email.AS