advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
  • 05.18.10

Sustainability Faceoff: McDonald’s vs. Starbucks

Comparing Starbucks and McDonald’s may not seem to make sense at first, but the two chains actually have a lot in common–namely, they both promise quick and easy food and beverages on the go, and both companies have recently ramped up sustainability efforts. In the new book The HIP Investor, author R. Paul Herman attempts to compare the two mega-chains. Below, we do the same.

mcdonalds starbucks faceoff

Comparing Starbucks and McDonald’s may not seem to make sense at first, but the two chains actually have a lot in common–namely, they both promise quick and easy food and beverages on the go, and both companies have recently ramped up sustainability efforts. In the new book The HIP Investor, author R. Paul Herman attempts to compare the two mega-chains. Below, we do the same.

advertisement

Let’s just be clear–the inherent unhealthiness of most McDonald’s meals give the chain a major disadvantage, even when compared to Starbucks’ high-calorie Frappucinos. That being said, McDonald’s has made some inroads in sustainability. A few examples: a “green” McDonald’s that offers an EV chargepoint, LED light fixtures, drought
tolerant landscape plants, and an Energy Efficiency Education Dashboard; an environmental scorecard for suppliers; a successful sustainable fisheries program; and a next-generation fryer that allows restaurants to cook the same amount of product while using approximately 40% less oil than with traditional fryers.

But there’s still plenty that would be would like to see. How about smaller portion sizes, for example? And yes, we realize that the “supersize” option is no longer available–but that’s not enough. In an interview with R. Paul Herman, Bob Langert, the VP of Corporate Responsibility at McDonald’s, explained, “We are offering
choice–new menu items and new portion sizes, giving information
to make these choices. This is a significant thing to do.” McDonald’s would also do well to use more grass-fed beef and increase its use of organic fruits and vegetables. And then there’s the most disturbing question of them all: Why don’t McDonald’s burgers decompose?

Starbucks fares better on all counts. The coffee chain has a goal of using only responsibly grown and ethically traded coffee by 2015, and it hopes to have 100% reusable or recyclable cups by the same year. Starbucks takes the extra step of offers farmers
incentives to prevent deforestation, with pilot programs currently
underway in Sumatra, Indonesia,
and Chiapas, Mexico. The company is also well-known for its partner (AKA employee) health care–the chain does, in fact, spend more on health care than on coffee bean purchases in the U.S.

Is Starbucks perfect? Of course not. While McDonald’s caters to a crowd specifically interested in fast food chains (if they don’t go to McD’s, they will probably head to Burger King or Wendy’s), Starbucks has the unfortunate tendency to challenge local coffee shops for much-needed business. But the company is moving quickly toward sustainability, and so we have to declare it as the winner.

Check out the full HIP Investor chart below.

  McDonald’s   Starbucks  
Overview  Over 31,000 restaurants in 118 countries;
$23.5 billion revenue, 400,000 employees
   Over 16,000 locations
in over 50 countries, $9.8 billion revenue (FY09); 117,000 partners (employees) **
 
Product Premium salads, fruit and yogurt parfait,
and apple dippers in Happy Meal choices; packaging gives customers essential
nutrition information in easy-to-understand icon and bar chart format
  In U.S., spends
more on partner health care than coffee bean purchases; The largest purchaser of Fairtrade certified coffee in the world **
 
Management
Practices
19 of 25:
Carefully managing supply chain to control costs and implement sustainability,
and developing an environmental scorecard to measure supplier performance
  21 of 25:
Sustainability built into business vision, all performance metrics and
product development decisions; From fiscal 2000 to 2009, farmer loan commitments totaled $14.5 million, goal is $20 million by 2015; Partners encouraged to volunteer, with a goal of 1 million hours of community service by 2015 **
 
Health

of 20%


In 2009 customer satisfaction is 70%; 82% of crew would recommend
working at McDonalds to a friend
 
10%   Customer satisfaction is 76%; all staff more than 20 hours/week have health
care access
 
14%
Wealth

of 20%

Crew members earn an average of $7.60 per hour; 93% of eligible employees
participate in 401(k) plan, made easier by $20 per month auto-deductions
9%  Starbucks average hourly pay rates vary across the U.S. and the globe; baristas in the U.S. are eligible for a base rate increase after six months, and a performance based increase every six months thereafter.; The Stock Investment Plan allows eligible partners to buy Starbucks stock (up to 10% of base pay) at a 5% discount; Through the Bean Stock program, stock options granted annually to eligible partners in 16 countries from part-time hourly up to (but not including the director level based on the company’s performance **  13%
Earth

of 20%


About 82% of the consumer packaging used in its nine largest markets
made from renewable materials and 30% of the material comes from recycled
fiber. Despite testing of innovative materials, have not yet identified
more sustainable packaging materials that are commercially viable
9% In fiscal year 2009, Starbucks served more than 26 million beverages in reusable cups, and approx. 70% (2,163) of its company-owned stores in North America that control their own waste collection recycled items made from one or more materials; Starbucks is working toward 100% reusable or recyclable cups by 2015 ** 12%
Equality

of 20%

37%
of all U.S. owner-operators are women and minorities; 26.7% of worldwide
leadership are women
15%
Among managers, approx. 31% are ethnic minorities and 66% are women (6/1/2008-5/31/2009)
**
12%
Trust

of 20%

Guidelines to determine the sustainability of fisheries developed in
partnership with Conservation International
14% All suppliers that adhere to C.A.F.E. status undergo third-party verification; By 2015, Starbucks’ goal is to purchase 100% responsibly grown and ethically traded coffee, which the company defines as coffee that has been third-party verified or certified, either through Coffee and Farmer Equity Practices, Fairtrade, or another externally audited system   ** 13%
Human Impact

of 100%

TOTAL 56%
TOTAL 64%
Corporate Profit

of 20%

+30.1% return on equity (2008)

+20.4% annualized total return, including reinvested dividends (6/2004–6/2009

+23.4% annualized total return, including reinvested dividends (6/2006–6/2009)

  +12.8%
return on equity (fiscal 2009)

-6.2%
annualized total return, including reinvested dividends (6/2004–6/2009)

-16.3%  
annualized total return, including reinvested dividends (6/2006–6/2009)

 

 

Read more Sustainability Faceoffs.

advertisement

** = Updated Data From Starbucks


HIP Investor

About the author

Ariel Schwartz is a Senior Editor at Co.Exist. She has contributed to SF Weekly, Popular Science, Inhabitat, Greenbiz, NBC Bay Area, GOOD Magazine and more.

More