Fast company logo
|
advertisement

A glut of eco-labels has actually made it harder to consume responsibly.

BY suzanne labarre1 minute read

green labels

The Washington Post has an infographic on the incredible number of green labels
flooding the marketplace in recent years. Fair Trade, Certified
Naturally Grown, Energy Star, FSC, LEED, OTCO, EPEAT…. How do you keep it all straight?

You don’t. Based on a survey by the World Resources Institute, Duke University and the green analyst Big
Room Inc.
, 600 labels worldwide dispatch some sort of eco -benchmark; 80
of those are in the United States. As the chart shows, topping the list
are food (90); retail (74); buildings (64); and miscellaneous industry
(79), including things like pest control. This has spawned all sorts of turf wars between environmentalists about whose label reigns
supreme.

More importantly, we no longer have any easy way to tell between honest intent and greenwashing. Most certification systems aren’t
regulated at all, so unless you have a lot of time on your hands, it’s
impossible to determine which are best. Coffee that’s USDA Organic or
Fair Trade? Wood certified by the Forest Stewardship Council or the
Sustainable Forestry Initiative? Even if something has a green cert,
how do you know it actually meets the standard? And with so many
different labels on the books, how could you possibly keep track?
Systems that were supposed to make it easier for us to consume
responsibly have actually made it harder. And while rating groups like the Good Guide cut through all the B.S., there’s still no obvious solution for the store shelf, where decisions are actually being made.

advertisement

More on green-rating problems here and here.

Recognize your brand’s excellence by applying to this year’s Brands That Matter Awards before the early-rate deadline, May 3.

PluggedIn Newsletter logo
Sign up for our weekly tech digest.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Privacy Policy

Explore Topics