advertisement
advertisement
  • 12.18.09

Growth? Part 1

“What you measure affects what you do,” according to Nobel-prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz in a recent New York Times cover story.  Every CEO I know agrees. 

“What you measure affects what you do,” according to
Nobel-prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz
in a recent New
York Times
cover story.  Every
CEO I know agrees. 

advertisement

So, in the middle of an oxymoronic ‘jobless recovery’ why do
we continue to confuse economic growth with economic health? 

If GDP is projected to grow by 3% in 2009, but unemployment
is up, our stacks of unpaid bills continue to rise, and we feel less secure
about our retirement or ability to pay for kids’ college, then should we feel
‘the economy is back on track’?

This is the common sense message of the latest, and to my
knowledge most mainstream, report urging policymakers to adopt new measures of
national economic health and update or drop outdated metrics like GDP, which
count illness, pollution, and natural disasters in the ‘good column.’  The UK-based, New Economics Foundation has for
years offered alternate measures of National
Accounts of Well-Being
.  Sorry to
spoil the surprise, but like in global rankings on education, the US doesn’t
stack up so well. 

The report confirms our own experience that a period of high
economic growth has not resulted in greater prosperity or security for all of
us.  And, importantly, that the way by
which growth is achieved (i.e. depleting sources of cheap oil) will impact our
children’s ability to enjoy even our current quality of life. 

In the next chapter of this story, we’ll see that what’s
true for countries, is true for companies. 

 

Video