Hey you – a 60% owner of General Motors. Are you worried about the innovative dynamism
of the post-bankruptcy, government-owned GM?
Are you anxious about whether they are truly committed to excellence? Have
no fear, kick-back and have a Margarita.
Because this week, the company proudly announced
via a press release that they are launching an online suggestion box called
Fritz.” Gee, wow, holy crap, that’s the kind of disruptive thinking we
And as a measure of how desperate the media is
for any stirring of life in the old jalopy, the Wall Street Journal
actually wrote a story about it.
There are three devastating and telling problems
with Tell Fritz.
a) It’s laughably unoriginal. There are more than
one million search hits for “online suggestion box.” Thousands of companies have one. Is GM is so
sheet-metaled from the world they don’t realize that is a digitally ancient
idea, and that it’s an embarrassment to make a big hoo-ha about it?
And it gets worse. Go visit the site and you’ll see that the
copy describes “Tell Fritz” as a request for suggestions. But in the accompanying video on the site,
Fritz bungles the story. First, he gets
the name wrong, calling it the “Ask Fritz Blog if you will.” Then he goes on to describe it as a place to
get questions answered; that’s not a suggestion box.
The guy is clearly out of his element. And how sloppy is that mistake? We’re counting on them to make cars with the
features of the future, and they can’t even keep their own site features
straight. The fact that they don’t even
know the difference between a blog and an online suggestion box illuminates
their corporate thickness.
What’s happening here is that they’re using
social media as a placation strategy, without any real understanding of how it
works. (And we can only grimly estimate how many taxpayers dollars went into building
this fiasco of a website)
b) Even if you think “Tell Fritz” is a really important
step, have the smarts to execute it with some follow-through. Take Starbucks. Their version of “Tell Fritz” – “My
Starbucks Idea” is fully blown-out: you share your ideas, the community
votes and discusses the ideas. Most
important, you get to watch their progress.
By contrast, GM has nothing but a lame little box
for your suggestions with a 255 maximum character limit. (If you can rescue the domestic car industry
in 300 characters, sorry, we’re not interested.) That’s the extent of it. No follow-through, no opportunity for the
community to build on the ideas or for GM to engage in a conversation. Just a black hole.
The rest of the website is equally redolent of
corporate committee-making, including incessant repetition of the “reinvention” meme, links that take you to PR propaganda, invitations to exciting chats on
subjects like “Buick and GMC” and dreary photos of company leadership.
c) Even if executed well, this online suggestion
box is nothing more than digital theater, a transparent attempt to make the
company seem cool Which it won’t. (The GM Twitter feed, which they have been
strenuously pushing, has only 1,714 followers; the CEO of Zappos has over a
million followers.) Social media isn’t a
business strategy, it’s a medium where business strategy gets executed.
The real problem is that GM is afraid to lead,
and Tell Fritz reminds us of their fearfulness. Leadership means taking
consumers to a place where they want to go, even if they don’t know it or
understand it yet. That takes courage.
But GM has been so bludgeoned for not listening to the market that
their response is to over-listen. (This is an unintended consequence of all
those furious Senators berating Rick Wagoner and Fritz Henderson for not being responsive.)
A new, smaller, bankruptcy-chagrined GM won’t
recapture the American mind and the American mood by being an order-taker.
When GM and Ford owned the culture with their
muscle cars, it wasn’t because they polled, surveyed and canvassed car buyers. And it wasn’t a “Tell Steve” functionality
that inspired the iPod or the iPhone over at Apple. Visionary designers possess a creative
alchemy that combines an un-ignited spark in the consumer’s fantasy life with
technology and hurtles the result into existence.
Fritz Henderson has promised that at General
Motors “Business as usual is over.” Well, I’m not sure that’s true.
The company is still trapped in PR-inflected hyperbole; the Chevy Volt
website proclaims that the The Extended-Range Electric Vehicle that is
re-defining the automotive world is no longer just a rumor. In fact, its
propulsion system is so revolutionary, it’s unlike any other vehicle or
electric car that’s ever been introduced.
To the extent GM has departed from business as
usual, let’s hope that Tell Fritz and its other granite-footed attempts to
humanize and ingratiate the brand aren’t the highlights. I’m not hopeful. A new spot for the 2010 Buick LaCrosse “one
of the automaker’s most-critical post-bankruptcy initiatives” is so
flagrantly pathetic that even their éminence grise Bob Lutz, who used to run
product for the company and now runs marketing publically complained that the
spot “irks” him.
Putting the spot aside, “LaCrosse” itself has a
deadly ring. It embodies everything
hollow and false about the old GM and its transparently pretentious approach to
naming cars. And do you pronounce it as
LA-crosse, faux French style, or luh-KRAWS, as in the sport that can get you an
athletic scholarship to a good college?
Either way, it’s not going to attract the younger
buyers who are crucial to Buick’s health. Do you know anyone who would
willingly answer the question What kind of car did you buy with a “LaCrosse?”
I think I’ll “Tell Fritz” that myself. Will let you know if he answers.