<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>wikipedia</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/wikipedia</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>Does Managing Your Corporate Reputation Have to Drive You Mad? Four Points to Consider </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/norman-birnbach/pr-back-talk/four-points-consider-corporate-reputation</link>
 <description>Recently, Circuit City made news because of an employee&#039;s reaction to a spoof published in Mad Magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can check out the faux ad &lt;a href=&quot;http://gizmodo.com/5032674/circuit-city-demands-all-copies-of-mad-magazine-with-ad-parody-destroyed&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I read Mad Magazine as a kid, years ago -- the exact number of years ago is not relevant; most of the usual gang of idiots from when I read it are still alive and still writing for it. (How&#039;s that for a career plateau?) And now they have a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dccomics.com/mad/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;website&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/norman-birnbach/pr-back-talk/four-points-consider-corporate-reputation&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/es">es</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/innovation-2">Innovation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/journalism">journalism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/media">media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/pr">PR</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/public-relations">public relations</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/ragan-report">Ragan Report</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/reputation">reputation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/steven-rattner">Steven Rattner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/streisand-effect">Streisand Effect</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/unpublished">unpublished</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/wall-st-journal">Wall St. Journal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/wikipedia">wikipedia</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/xeni-jardin">Xeni Jardin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/technology-1">Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/leadership-2">Leadership</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/management-1">Management</category>
 <node>975849</node>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:52:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Norman Birnbach</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">975849 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Question - If Wikipedia required the approval of all edits made to its content, would you be more or less likely to us</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/fast-talk-question/fast-talk-question-if-wikipedia-required-approval-all-edits-made-its-content-woul</link>
 <description>If Wikipedia required the approval of all edits made to its content, would you be more or less likely to use the site?</description>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/editorial-approval">editorial approval</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/wikipedia">wikipedia</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/technology-1">Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/worklife-2">Work/Life</category>
 <node>973030</node>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:29:53 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Fast Company staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">973030 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bio and Interests: Enric Senabre</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/profile-bio-and-interests/profile-bio-and-interests-esenabre-infonomia-com</link>
 <description>I&#039;m currently working at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infonomia.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Infonomia&lt;/a&gt;, the Spanish leading innovation hub, as Content Manager for its website.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/innovation-2">Innovation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/open-source">open source</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/sustainability">sustainability</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/wikipedia">wikipedia</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/technology-1">Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/social-responsibility-1">Social Responsibility</category>
 <node>690206</node>
 <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:21:26 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Enric Senabre</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">690206 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is Your Brand Real? (Wikipedia or Bust...)</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/641424</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Wikipedia vs Encyclopedia&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Wikipedia is often compared to encyclopedias while people debate which is better, more reliable, and more accurate. In response to one such study by the sience journal &lt;em&gt;Nature&lt;/em&gt;, Britannica refuted the study in &lt;a href=&quot;http://http://corporate.britannica.com/britannica_nature_response.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a PDF published on their corporate website&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Wikipedia&#039;s Rapid Ascent  &lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/node/641424&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/ads">ads</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/advertising">advertising</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/creativity">creativity</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/culture">culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/google">google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/ideas">ideas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/innovation-2">Innovation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/innovation">Innovation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/internet">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/marketing">Marketing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/pr">PR</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/web">Web</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/wikipedia">wikipedia</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/technology-1">Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/design-1">Design</category>
 <node>641424</node>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:27:16 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>aaron wall</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">641424 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
