<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>transparency</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/transparency</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>Cause Marketing: Should There Be Transparency?</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/heather-sherbert/cause-marketing-should-there-be-transparency</link>
 <description>My views on whether transparency should be required in Cause Marketing relationships.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/cause-marketing">cause marketing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/transparency">transparency</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/social-responsibility-1">Social Responsibility</category>
 <node>1097433</node>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:52:30 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Heather Sherbert</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1097433 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cause Marketing: Should There Be Transparency?</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/heather-sherbert/cause-marketing-should-there-be-transparency/cause-marketing-should-there-be-t</link>
 <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;As the holidays approach, no matter where you live, what religion you are, or what holiday you celebrate, you are probably one of the millions of people around the world who will get together with their friends and family to celebrate.&lt;span&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;Along with these celebrations, some people believe that it is a time for the “season of giving” to people less fortunate than themselves.&lt;span&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;Many corporations also follow thi&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/heather-sherbert/cause-marketing-should-there-be-transparency/cause-marketing-should-there-be-t&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/cause-marketing">cause marketing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/transparency">transparency</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/social-responsibility-1">Social Responsibility</category>
 <node>1097434</node>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 21:51:20 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Heather Sherbert</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1097434 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Do Something: An IPO</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/131/do-something-an-ipo.html</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;The typical not-for-profit sends its donors a thank-you note, a glossy annual report with pretty pictures, and maybe an umbrella or a book -- not exactly the seeds of loyalty or deeper involvement. New York-based Do Something, which aims to get teens involved in volunteering, wanted to create a class of donors who did something more. In other sectors, such people are often known as shareholders, so the organization launched an IPO in September.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/131/do-something-an-ipo.html&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/board">Board</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/do-something">Do Something</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/financial-return">financial return</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/investors">investors</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/ipo">IPO</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/nancy-lublin">Nancy Lublin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/shareholder-meetings">shareholder meetings</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/shareholders">shareholders</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/social-enterprises-year">social enterprises of the year</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/transparency">transparency</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/social-responsibility-1">Social Responsibility</category>
 <node>1093658</node>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:00:17 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jeff Chu</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1093658 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Talking Religion at Work - When is it acceptable? </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/john-havens/tactical-transparency-business/talking-religion-work-when-it-acceptable</link>
 <description>Everyone says you&#039;re not supposed to talk about politics and religion
but people generally talk politics at work or in other &amp;quot;off limits&amp;quot;
settings.  I&#039;m wondering why if someone mentions their faith at work
(unless they&#039;re mentioning a holiday they&#039;re taking off) people
immediately clam up and just nod their head?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I realize it&#039;s not politically correct to get too specific about faith
issues at work, but it seems strange to me.  If a person&#039;s faith/world
belief is so central to who they are, wouldn&#039;t their views/beliefs be&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/john-havens/tactical-transparency-business/talking-religion-work-when-it-acceptable&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/authenticity">authenticity</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/business">business</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/change-management">change management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/transparency">transparency</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/leadership-2">Leadership</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/management-1">Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/social-responsibility-1">Social Responsibility</category>
 <node>1055609</node>
 <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:43:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John  Havens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1055609 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Transparent Leaders: The Health of John McCain and Steve Jobs</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/kevin-ohannessian/not-quite-conversation/transparent-leaders-health-john-mccain-and-steve-jobs</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; published an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/20/us/politics/20health.html?_r=1&amp;amp;ref=health&amp;amp;oref=slogin&quot; target=&quot;_new&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;article today&lt;/a&gt; about how transparent the candidates are being about their health. The incomplete nature and unanswered questions about John McCain&#039;s history of skin cancer has been a topic of discussion on liberal blogs ever since Sarah Palin was chosen as his running mate, but the subject has finally reached the media. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/kevin-ohannessian/not-quite-conversation/transparent-leaders-health-john-mccain-and-steve-jobs&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/apple">apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/barack-obama">barack obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/health">health</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/medical-records">Medical Records</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/steve-jobs">steve jobs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/transparency">transparency</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/leadership-2">Leadership</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/social-responsibility-1">Social Responsibility</category>
 <node>1051705</node>
 <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:13:43 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kevin Ohannessian</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1051705 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tactical Transparency and Fighting Fair</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/john-havens/tactical-transparency-business/tactical-transparency-and-fighting-fair</link>
 <description>CNN has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/03/17/sunny.juicy/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;an interesting video&lt;/a&gt; (&amp;quot;Online campus gossips won&#039;t show their faces) about a popular campus website called, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.juicycampus.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Juicy Campus&lt;/a&gt;.
Long story short, the site allows people to post anonymously and it&#039;s
allowing a lot of people to be really nasty.  Granted, it does allow
some folks to post relatively innocuous items (&amp;quot;what sorority should I&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/john-havens/tactical-transparency-business/tactical-transparency-and-fighting-fair&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/authenticity">authenticity</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/business">business</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/change-management">change management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/transparency">transparency</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/leadership-2">Leadership</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/management-1">Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/social-responsibility-1">Social Responsibility</category>
 <node>870148</node>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 22:39:20 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John  Havens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">870148 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tactical Transparency for Business</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/profile-blog/tactical-transparency-business</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The rise of blogging and social networking has engendered a passion for corporate authenticity from employees and customers alike.  Companies engaging in dialogue versus monologue demonstrate to their audience that they&#039;re willing to take and respond to feedback plus potentially admit they don&#039;t know answers to every question concerning their brand. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/profile-blog/tactical-transparency-business&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/authenticity">authenticity</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/business">business</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/change-management">change management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/transparency">transparency</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/leadership-2">Leadership</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/management-1">Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/social-responsibility-1">Social Responsibility</category>
 <node>842719</node>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 09:52:34 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John  Havens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">842719 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Social Intelligentsia</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/aainaa-ridtz-ar/adverbatim/social-intelligentsia</link>
 <description>Transparency is much needed in an almost ‘border less’ world, especially where the Internet is concerned - social media, social support and social business will evolve in the not too distant future - maybe not in ten years time, but ‘now’ as in yesterday.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/aainaa-ridtz-ar/adverbatim/social-intelligentsia&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/innovation-2">Innovation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/intelligence">intelligence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/security">security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/social">social</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/transparency">transparency</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/technology-1">Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/leadership-2">Leadership</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/management-1">Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/careers-1">Careers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/design-1">Design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/social-responsibility-1">Social Responsibility</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/worklife-2">Work/Life</category>
 <node>626977</node>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:58:23 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Aainaa-Ridtz AR</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">626977 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
