The Next Web blames  Reader's demise on Google+, Goog's social media service, quoting Brian Shih, a former Google Reader product manager.
"Reader has been fighting for approval/survival at Google since long before I was a PM for the product. I’m pretty sure Reader was threatened with de-staffing at least three times before it actually happened. It was often for some reason related to social:
2008 – let’s pull the team off to build OpenSocial. 2009 – let’s pull the team off to build Buzz. 2010 – let’s pull the team off to build Google+.
It turns out they decided to kill it anyway in 2010, even though most of the engineers opted against joining G+. Ironically, I think the reason Google always wanted to pull the Reader team off to build these other social products was that the Reader team actually understood social (and tried a lot of experiments over the years that informed the larger social features at the company). Reader’s social features also evolved very organically in response to users, instead of being designed top-down like some of Google’s other efforts."
Twitter  this morning is full of alternative services to use, such as Reeder and Feedly. (Here's Fast Company's guide to iPad readers from 2011 ). And, of course, Twitter wouldn't be Twitter without the conspiracy theories. Apparently the forthcoming demise of Reader is the Pope's fault.
Two weeks of no pope: baby cured of HIV, breath test for cancer, salt water found on moon of Jupiter. Day one with pope: Google Reader dies.— Jamster (@jamster83) March 14, 2013 
Are you upset by Google's decision--which was nothing to do with the bottom line, says Shih--or had you migrated to a different RSS reader long ago? Does Google+ deserve a boycott as a result, or do you think that this is just a sign of progress and something bigger and better will come from Mountain View before too long? Will you sign Dan Lewis's petition, or are you hoping for semi-divine intervention and a statement from Francis I ? Use our comments box for your wise words, please.