Why would Apple release a tablet device  sporting a screen of around 7 inches  and coming at a price that's significantly lower than the $499 entry price for a new full-sized iPad? Who would buy, it, and what would they use it for?
These questions (slightly pre-mature, admittedly, as we still don't know that much about the machine) began as an informal poll in Fast Company's digital office asking: "Would you buy an iPad mini?"
Of the eight responses, two people said yes, definitely; three replied absolutely not; and three others said: yes, eventually. That's not a resounding thumbs-up, but it's a sign, however small, that Apple could sell truckloads of iPad minis--even if they don't match the popular appeal of the record-breaking iPhone 5.
A quick round of questions on Twitter turned up both positive and negative responses--roughly mirroring our office's answers in proportion.
The reasons for each of the answers are interesting--let's dig in:
The conclusion is complex, but likely positive for Apple. Many people, it seems, are attracted by the idea of a smaller iPad, at the right price. It's also unlikely to seriously cannibalize existing Apple sales: People who already own an iPad may see little need for a mini, unless they're upgrading from an original iPad and are seeking much more power from the new device, while people who need or prefer larger screen real estate will simply choose a full-size iPad. The iPad mini detractors are the same sort of people who wouldn't buy a big iPad in any case, perhaps because they're anti-Apple, they already own enough devices to meet their needs, or they simply prefer the pocketability of an iPhone.
Apple appears to already knows this. You could argue that it's subtly promoted the appeal of a larger screen on a device in its recent new hardware releases including a new iPod Nano with a bigger screen, better for viewing video and that taller screen on the new iPhone 5  and new iPod touch. So you know what's bigger than these devices? An iPad Mini! And sure--the mini is no 9.7-inch monster iPad, but it's almost as powerful and it's much cheaper and more portable still (you can imagine the PR pitch now). Rumors are  that Apple's even side-stepping the existing 7-inch tablet market, populated with Fires and Nexuses and a slew of unbranded Android tablets, and will marry iPad 2-inspired guts (for cheapness) with a 7.85-inch screen. How about that for a subtle play?
We also know that 7.85 inches is not far off a paperback book size, and that Apple's made a big play  into next-gen digital books and, specifically, e-textbooks for students. A $300-ish iPad mini with a hefty educational discount would likely sell by the millions into schools all around the world.
In terms of price, Apple's had years to tinker with the technical specs, and sizes of its iPods and, more specifically, to adjust their prices, adding to the range at the top and bottom end to appeal to new markets. Thus an iPad mini would fit perfectly into its product line up, pitched at a different market with a different spending power. It's almost inevitable given Apple's own precedents.
So we can guess from our (non-scientific) poll that the potential iPad mini buyer is likely a parent of young kids. They're certainly budget-conscious but also tempted by the siren call of mobile computing combined with the portability of a tiny iPad. On the whole mini buyers won't be professional be-suited types, unless these folk are such heavy commuters that the smaller size appeals to them ... or they're a teacher. And interestingly enough for Apple and its bottom line, mini buyers are not necessarily current iDevice owners.
Considering the widespread awareness of the idea of the iPad mini, resulting in so many responses from the public for this piece, Apple probably wouldn't even have to spend much on iPad minimarketing.
[Image: Flickr user Ken Fager ]