<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/99874</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-283</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is ironic to me as a user of AutoDesk products to see them on this list.  I suppose their success as a business, and as a technology innovator merits #25.  However, it is worth noting that many of their users are at best begrudging at accepting their market dominance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In ten years of architectural practice, I can&#039;t say that I&#039;ve met ANYONE who truly loved AutoDesk&#039;s products.  In many cases, they are in fact loathed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;True competition would serve the industry well-- someone needs to inspire improvements to AutoDesk&#039;s user interfaces, help documentation, and pricing structure.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:00:03 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jeremy Fretts</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">712050 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
