<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/97338</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/fast-talk-response/fast-talk-response-335</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;No. Lax measures, controls, agreements with regards to deliverables does. Not to mention employee behavior on both sides of the fence.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:35:15 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nico Navarro</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">691445 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/fast-talk-response/fast-talk-response-334</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;No. Are we talking about &quot;required by regulation?&quot; Sounds like, should we require fastfood companies to be truthful to the nutritional content of products sold? If not, then require managers of these establishments to formally ask their patrons if they should do so.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:28:07 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nico Navarro</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">691439 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/fast-talk-response/fast-talk-response-332</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Be transparent in intent and context&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; Get Agreement&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; Review &quot;Agreement&quot; regularly and/ or on a schedule that is open to all&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:53:30 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nico Navarro</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">691369 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
