<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/95298</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/638562</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Swatch was as usual ahead of its time. On the other hand, we at GreenTyme.org think that we have made a logical case for going back to -- or at least factoring in -- a more natural and human mode of telling time, rather than just continuing the, by now, post-modern and post-industrial trend towards a world enthralled by corporatized artificial time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/node/638562&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:24:56 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Yale Landsberg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">638562 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
