<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/94657</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/827550</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently Philippe Starck produced a lot of fashionable decoration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://tailrank.com/5555401/Philippe-Starck-says-that-design-is-dead-and-that-he-s&quot; title=&quot;http://tailrank.com/5555401/Philippe-Starck-says-that-design-is-dead-and-that-he-s&quot;&gt;http://tailrank.com/5555401/Philippe-Starck-says-that-design-is-dead-and...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smh.com.au/news/richard-glover/designers-too-busy-to-do-any-good-design/2008/04/04/1207249450280.html&quot; title=&quot;http://www.smh.com.au/news/richard-glover/designers-too-busy-to-do-any-good-design/2008/04/04/1207249450280.html&quot;&gt;http://www.smh.com.au/news/richard-glover/designers-too-busy-to-do-any-g...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <node>827550</node>
 <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 04:06:20 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Leong</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">827550 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/827532</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Agree with everyone else. how dumb do marketeers think relatively savvy bloggers/ blog readers are?  It is too easy for the readers to retaliate with blogs on these fake bloggers... the viral campaign will be turned against the advertiser.  A single blogger or YouTube poster and cause amazing damage to a brand - seen any of those (anti-) Comcast blogs and videos...?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <node>827532</node>
 <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 03:58:42 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Leong</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">827532 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/827531</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;ridiculous question to stir the pot.  and it&#039;s working. too many variables - age group(s), single or married, type of business, company size/ formality, etc etc&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <node>827531</node>
 <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 03:53:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Leong</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">827531 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/827518</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Women are only working for pocket money anyway, right?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OK, before I get reported, I am kidding.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why would women get laid off first?  Where is this old boys&#039; club - I have not seen it.  In any clamp-down, both ends of the spectrum will be laid off first - the useless people, and oddly enough, the most talented people when there is voluntary redundancy offered - they take the &#039;bonus&#039; and hop straight into another job.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <node>827518</node>
 <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 03:48:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Leong</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">827518 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/827505</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Travel and entertainment is not really the same as Food.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And Travel is not the same as entertainment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Travel is less subjective and more black-and-white - if a hotel is literally a flea pit and dirty, there is little subjectivity in that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/node/827505&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <node>827505</node>
 <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 03:26:33 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Leong</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">827505 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/782750</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Brand = lifestyle association.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. take a $30 pair of jeans and compare it with a $100+ pair of jeans.  Remove all labels.  Is there a real difference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. People who buy eg the Infiniti G series would probably never buy the Nissan Skyline series (they are the same car).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <node>782750</node>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:35:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Leong</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">782750 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/778426</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t think anyone is saying Technology or technologists are not important.  Tom is talking about the success of deployment, and you cannot count on the technology alone.&lt;br /&gt;
Take another piece of &#039;old&#039; technology, CRM.  It is never about the Technology, it is always always about business buy-in/ adoption.  So ditto for Web 2.0 - it&#039;s all about consumer adoption, in other words, it is not whether a site has a blog or not, but what the blog is about...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <node>778426</node>
 <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:22:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Leong</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">778426 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/778412</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think simply people don&#039;t ask for it.  For a level of seniority where there is an individual contract, most don&#039;t even ask for more than the &#039;standard&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
For the others, yes there are collective bargaining issues, and without a &#039;collective&#039; like union representation, where would you even start to ask for more vacation?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <node>778412</node>
 <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:13:55 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Leong</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">778412 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/770643</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s a very open question.  The bottomline relates to viability, ie positive cash flow.  The sites that have a strategy of getting acquired by News, MicroSoft etc are merely placing bets.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/node/770643&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <node>770643</node>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:57:23 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Leong</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">770643 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Good and bad</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/blog-post/good-and-bad</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I like the concept - that whether you are logged in or not governs how the site is personalized.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have quite a number of thoughts and will address each separately as I come across them, rather than providing a full review of the site in one go.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;og_rss_groups&quot;&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;links&quot;&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;first last og_links&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/group/beta-testers&quot; class=&quot;og_links&quot;&gt;Site Advisors &amp;amp; Testers&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/blog-post/good-and-bad&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/taxonomy/term/1633">beta test</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/taxonomy/term/1634">beta tester</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/taxonomy/term/188">Design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/taxonomy/term/23">fast company</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/taxonomy/term/1635">site design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/taxonomy/term/1636">site functionality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/taxonomy/term/1637">user experience</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/taxonomy/term/7">Design</category>
 <node>620383</node>
 <group domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/group/beta-testers">Site Advisors &amp;amp; Testers</group>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:06:10 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Leong</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">620383 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
