<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/77585</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-739</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Despite your effort to bypass the traditional ways of marketing and media coverage in favor of blogging, you, maybe unconsciously, fell in the same, common trap: you define success as &quot;traditional media ubiquitous-ness&quot;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, what is the difference if the outcome is the same? There are many published authors who do exceptionally well without even having a blog, without being &quot;media darlings&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-739&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:42:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Thei Zervaki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">776333 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
