<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/52669</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/fast-talk-response/fast-talk-response-206</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It can, if you proceed with caution.  I find myself recommending FC to adult business students who have become used to interactivity in all their really reliable sources...including me.  FC ought to be moreso. However, the danger with a &quot;blogged&quot; environment remains, as with talk radio, that not just the concerned and involved participate, but also the uninformed and compulsive malcontents.  For this medium to maintain credibility as a source (and a forum), participants should cite their own credentials, or have them readily accessible to readers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/fast-talk-response/fast-talk-response-206&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:30:11 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Kelsey</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">682364 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
