<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/51318</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-2661</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;How can a logo, conceived outside of your business&#039;s strategy and objectives, possibly reflect the value of an organization?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The process of developing a logo - researching the market, talking to customers/stakeholders, aligning visuals with actual communications objectives - is as important (maybe even more) as the final output.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-2661&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:53:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kluskiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1061176 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/780876</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Definitely not. Since the features of so many products and services can easily be copied, you have to communicate subtle differences - for example, a unique team or a special vision for the future. Sure, there will be commodity purchases, where price is the only deciding factor. But for value purchases, the backing of branding and identity signal a commitment to customers with a time horizon longer than the next minute.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 00:12:43 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kluskiewicz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">780876 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
