<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/27003</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/fast-talk-response/fast-talk-response-340</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As a designer it&#039;s my job to get people to try something one.  It&#039;s the manufacturer&#039;s job to get them to buy it again.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 03:14:55 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Shawn Davis</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">691637 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Commercial Art VS. Fine Art</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/shawn-davis/ramblings-designer/commercial-art-vs-fine-art</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
So the other day we had a client ask for some changes to their project&lt;br /&gt;
that…well, went against our better design judgement. We went through&lt;br /&gt;
the customary defense of the design, why it works and why their idea&lt;br /&gt;
was less than optimal in achieving the goals set for the piece. All&lt;br /&gt;
that said, we did what the client wanted because we are Commercial&lt;br /&gt;
Artists.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/shawn-davis/ramblings-designer/commercial-art-vs-fine-art&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/design-1">Design</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 04:23:02 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Shawn Davis</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">688842 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
