<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/218</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Coda&#039;s All-Electric Sedan Revs Up U.S. Auto Market</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/140/lighting-up-the-road.html</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sliding into the driver&#039;s&lt;/strong&gt; seat of Coda&#039;s electric sedan for the first time, I looked around for clues. Here&#039;s 100 years of automotive history, reinvented -- what&#039;s different? No gear-shift, just a knob that engages the car&#039;s two speeds, forward and reverse. A battery-life gauge. Not much else. Then I pull into midtown Manhattan traffic and hear the road noise, the thrum of passing air. They were always there, but now there&#039;s no engine roar to drown them out. The Coda&#039;s motor barely whimpers as it speeds into a new market for cars with no gas and no exhaust.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/140/lighting-up-the-road.html&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/cars">cars</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/coda">coda</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/electric-automobile">electric automobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/sedan">sedan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/honda-civic">Honda Civic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/kevin-czinger">Kevin Czinger</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/nissan">Nissan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/wheego">wheego</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/detroit-electric">Detroit Electric</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/sustainability">sustainability</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/innovation-2">Innovation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/technology-1">Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/social-responsibility-1">Ethonomics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/magazine-0">Magazine</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 13:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris Dannen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1400895 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How to Build an iPhone App That Doesn&#039;t Suck</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/multimedia/slideshows/content/iphone-build.html</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;
If it&#039;s not intuitive and good-looking, iPhone owners simply won&#039;t use it. Applications that are text-heavy tend to create too much cognitive load, while apps that use a combination of images and sparse text are much more manageable. Take a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flixster.com/%22&quot; target=&quot;_new&quot; title=&quot;Flixster&quot;&gt;Flixter&lt;/a&gt;&#039;s movie listings, that cram all the relevant information you need about a movie right next to its cover image, creating a rich list that requires very few taps to access information about a given movie.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/multimedia/slideshows/content/iphone-build.html&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/ireddit">iReddit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/apple">apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/iphone-apps">iphone apps</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/wedict">WeDict</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/applications">applications</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/phoneflix">PhoneFlix</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/flixter">Flixter</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/webmd">WebMD</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/runkeeper">RunKeeper</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/developer-sdk">Developer SDK</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/technology-1">Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/design-1">Design</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:45:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris Dannen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1203871 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-4657</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;At a conference on the 2012 Olympic Games this month, I had the opportunity to ask NBC General Counsel Rick Cotton about his thoughts on fair use and remixing. He had mentioned that popular video sites like YouTube have video-fingerprinting software that detects and removes copyrighted NBC content. I asked how loose the &quot;fingerprinting&quot; was -- specifically, if a user can splice and change footage enough to make it his or her own, and put it on YouTube as &quot;original&quot; work. His response was that NBC considers none of that activity fair use. (His exact words: &quot;The short answer is: No.&quot;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:44:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris Dannen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1191949 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-4638</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;EDIT: Amazon has just submitted to pressure from the Author&#039;s Guild, and will now make text-to-speech functionality optional on a per-title basis: &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10184406-93.html&quot; title=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10184406-93.html&quot;&gt;http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10184406-93.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:11:12 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris Dannen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1189835 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-4637</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;@ Larry White: If all you want to do it read on the Kindle, get Kindle 1. It&#039;s priced right and does all the same stuff. Kindle 2, in my opinion, is better for tech tinkerers who want to the latest and greatest, even if it&#039;s half-baked.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:05:57 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris Dannen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1189649 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-4636</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;@Noah, I wouldn&#039;t advocate any profit-sharing; I think Facebook is best as a Zuckerbergian dictatorship than a co-op if it wants to grow and stay solvent. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Earlier this month, when the company changed its terms of service, it was doing something it had to do -- it was taking a step towards generating more revenue. Governments are intrinsically bureaucratic and bad at yielding profit, because they encourage deliberation and welfare for all. That&#039;s good for real countries, but bad for Facebook, which has 1/3 the cashflow of MySpace (@Joe Momma) despite having 45 million more users.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-4636&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:53:14 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris Dannen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1189585 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
