<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/157864</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-4716</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Regarding the &quot;wasted&quot; power that is broadcast into oblivion, I do not think the technology works that way. The transmitter and receiver are resonant, so nearly all (well, more than 50%, anyway) of the transmitter power ends up in the receiver. My recollection is that Soljacic believes that efficiencies on the order of 75% are achievable. This is fairly respectable for a power supply, with 60% efficiency not uncommon in consumer electronics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-4716&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 08:25:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tim Stever</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1198196 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
