<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/157272</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/ant-168</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This article offers an interesting perspective, however if the increase is only 16% over print publications, it seems to me that it would be very much worthwhile to do.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s why.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With in-print publications, you keep having to print.   Every day, week, or month, depending on the type of publication, you have to produce x-million more magazines or newspapers for everybody to read each for each and every issue.  With a device, you only have to ship the device a _single_ time...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/ant-168&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:17:04 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mark Tarrabain</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1190946 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
