<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/155599</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-4486</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;@ Dave Swaney,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Interesting comment.  I am no electrical engineer nor have any vested interest in this technology.  But I did find this following article at this very site that might addresses your concern.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/132/big-green-and-juicy.html&quot; title=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/132/big-green-and-juicy.html&quot;&gt;http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/132/big-green-and-juicy.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That article concludes the wireless electricity is greener than charger plugs-in-socket counterparts.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:12:34 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ed Chen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1172098 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
