<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/154268</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-4247</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As a designer, the trend towards crowdsourcing competition websites is a little bit troubling. Something that this article tends to gloss over. Designers spend so much time working on creative drafts for clients - and traditionally this would be fine due to the knowledge of certain payment at the end. Crowdsourcing websites prevent this from happening and many of my colleagues are adamantly against such an approach.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, realistically, crowd-sourcing does have a place in the modern design world. Particularly now, when redundancy makes designers &quot;freelancers&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-4247&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:30:36 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Asmodius Fitch</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1151358 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
