<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/151729</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-4230</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Funny thing about this assessment, if the same total for Question 3-7, people having 50-Good contacts would have the same score as people who have 51-poor contacts.  Same thing goes with 50-VeryGood vs 101-Poor (or 205-Terrible).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:15:10 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Peng Ge</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1150596 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-4229</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;About the two noteworthy shifts, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s quite Convincing to conclude &quot;relationships component MUST become bigger part&quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
1) All it says is People may NOT want to wait 20-years, not necessarily means leadership development can be accelerated.&lt;br /&gt;
2) Internet provided better ways to communicate (network), that&#039;s it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not that I am a fan of the &quot;20%&quot; estimation from 20 years ago, but I believe it&#039;s just equally possible that &quot;relationship&quot; has the same importance as before.  The only thing changed (by Internet) was the effectiveness of how people communicate/network.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:08:20 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Peng Ge</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1150591 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-3942</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Talking about &quot;competing against Pavan Vishwakarma&quot;, it only means we shouldn&#039;t compete with him (them) in the fields that everyone can pick up easily, like web development. There are other fields/jobs that cannot be outsourced, thus still give out big paycheck with reasonable hours, if only you figure out what they are. ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:09 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Peng Ge</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1142394 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-3940</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think the freelance web developer was just working under-capacity and trying to get more jobs to work with, thus the extreme advertisement. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And since free-lance web developers are in surplus nowadays, I doubt how much such &quot;ad&quot; would help his business. ^_^&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:58:03 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Peng Ge</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1142392 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-3939</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If someone emails you about &quot;wants to endow a school in Vietnam&quot;, I bet he won&#039;t change his mind if the response email has to be sent out later, in the morning.  So what&#039;s the point? really!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:57:58 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Peng Ge</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1142389 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-3938</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Why would AOL VP &quot;ate the fee&quot; if caterers messed up the date?  Why would she &quot;blow up&quot; if caterers came as scheduled (maybe she is the one who messed up the date)?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another comment about &quot;freelance web designer&quot; who advertised as  working all hours, I think he was just working under-capacity and trying to get more jobs to work with, thus the extreme advertisement.  But I doubt if such &quot;ad&quot; would work, not only because free-lance web designers are in surplus, but also he still cannot compete with India/Chinese outsourcing labor.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:42:27 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Peng Ge</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1142380 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
