<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/150450</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-3758</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with &quot;Not on your life,&quot; the math in this scenario is a little off.  I think that might be one of the fundamental flaws in your excitement over Microsoft&#039;s model.  Both companies and residential users of Microsoft software (Microsoft *is* a software company, not a hardware company) would like to purchase a license that they are guaranteed will work the say way they did when they bought it.  Re: Windows XP.  If we have no need to upgrade every four years (and truthfully, many of &quot;new computer users&quot; do not), this model becomes even more archaic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-3758&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 15:46:14 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Brandyn Phelps</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1122316 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
