<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/150249</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-3729</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;With all due respect to the author, $35 million per year to maintain a 420,000 line program is expensive. Most organizations and consumers are not willing to shoulder than kind of expense. And no, this kind of process is not standard in every engineering discipline. There are tradeoffs for example in automotive design, it is possible to design and build a car that never breaks down, but would anyone be able to afford it? Yes, there are more rigourous engineering processes when the stakes are high (airplanes, chemical plants, etc..), but they come with commensurate costs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-3729&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:34:28 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tony BenBrahim</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1120961 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
