http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/149157 Member recent activity block for member profile page en http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-3602 <p>In response to David Sheffield and others in this thread:</p> <p>The service would be government mandated, not government provided. Why would the service provider give an equal quality system for free parallel to one they charge money for? How much money will it cost the company to service this 25% channel - will it be more than the benefits gained in selling services on the other 75%? Then why would anyone?</p> <p><a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-3602">read more</a></p> Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:19:45 -0500 Tim Steeno 1114901 at http://www.fastcompany.com