<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/147276</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-3324</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Good article. There&#039;s no doubt that social media outlets are a high growth industry and potential opportunity for companies to interact with consumers. On a larger scale, I&#039;m wondering how many big brands (like those mentioned in the article) are actually evaluating the financial impact of their social media investments on sales? How do these results compare to other marketing and media investments? If &quot;34 Papa John downloads&quot; is an indication of whether consumers really want to interact with big companies, then perhaps these companies really don&#039;t belong on facebook or twitter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-3324&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:51:57 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rick Sebok</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1094106 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
