<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/146985</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-3389</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;These emails are so ridiculous. He hasn&#039;t gotten any money yet, has he? Where I come from, that&#039;s called &quot;malicious prosecution&quot;. I smell a vendetta from Fink and these letters are pretty incriminating. You&#039;re right about the stereotypes. This type of exploitative behavior doesn&#039;t do the profession much good.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:20:29 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ben Metzl</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1100792 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-3261</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This is a great piece. But the really interesting thing for me is that company is specifically designing ads for web sites, geared around their content, not as much as they&#039;re sexually controversial. Still, a really good read!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:16:24 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ben Metzl</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1090048 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
