<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/145956</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-2985</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;While I don&#039;t dispute that the comments were juvenile, I would consider them sexual not sexist. Plus, most of them were an attempt at humor, not an intentional attempt to put women down. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think there is a big difference between the two. You could have avoided about half of those &quot;sexist&quot; comments by simply omitting the photos of the people you were talking about. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s completely natural for a guy (or girl) to size up a potential mate within a few seconds of seeing them. By including photos you automatically invited many digg members to do just that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-2985&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:01:25 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Andrew de Andrade</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1078860 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
