<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/145898</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-2957</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I always find articles like this interesting for various reasons. I would like to ask, why did you guys not do the &quot;The Most Influential People in Web 2.0&quot;. Why was it necessary to exclude men from this list? I submit that your article is sexist, by choosing to recognize women and not men. I believe you are seeing peoples reactions to that. It&#039;s kind of hypocritical is it not?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:11:36 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>New Commenter</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1078177 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
