<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/141961</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-2319</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I have to argue -- or at last contextualize -- with this assertion: &quot;...more than 75% of what we learn comes from experiences outside of any formal education program and from people we know outside the walls of any class.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1) The source cited (also written by the author) references a 1994 study that focuses *specifically* on job-related **training**. &quot;Training&quot; and &quot;learning&quot; are not synonymous. That said, the learning that takes place in the workplace is only one subset of all &quot;learning&quot;. [Original study:&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.bls.gov/ore/abstract/ec/ec940090.htm]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-2319&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 04:15:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>kathy gill</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1037026 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
