<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/141658</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-3391</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Georgetown law professor Rebecca Tushnet did not read the lawsuit and assumed that the suit would be for user generated content.  Oops! A little research would have shown that the suit has merit and is specific to the actions of Yelp.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:22:49 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Adryenn Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1100819 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-3390</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I had a few 5 star reviews, all stating verifiable results of what I had done for their business.  I earned the reviews. Yelp&#039;s reason for deleting those who weren&#039;t review trading...? Conflict of interest!  That we might not be able to downgrade a good review because we are in a networking group together. I see the reasoning and after much discussion with Jeremy agree with the logic.  But to delete us without warning, call us spammers, claim we were review trading when clearly I&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:12:28 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Adryenn Ashley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1100818 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
