<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/121230</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/879368</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This is one of the strangest bits of journalism I&#039;ve read in a while.  There&#039;s supposedly a &quot;new science called evolutionary economics&quot; but we hear nothing of its proponents, nothing of the seminal works in the literature.  What happened to who-what-when-where-why?  Worst of all, what&#039;s described doesn&#039;t sound at all new to me, as it&#039;s very similar to the work of the Austrian School, which has been going strong since 1870 and which has long-standing academic centers at NYU and elsewhere.  I didn&#039;t see the differentiators in this article.  Is the &quot;new science&quot; formalist or model-based?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/node/879368&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:39:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Sullivan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">879368 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
