<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/110098</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/792967</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I read this article. I was admazed how cutting edge AOL was. In my view, AOL got too big. They had the mindset of big execs, not small scappy operations. In this light they simply were blinded to see the inventory of tools that they had. Instead they please the suites and not thier customers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <node>792967</node>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:15:32 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mancine</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">792967 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/792954</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I would like to see how technology can be leveraged for new innovations or management control. I believe we are moving closer to having technology be seemless in the running of the business. It in the spirit of &quot;don&#039;t tell me how the database works, just tell me what it says!&quot; Where is the next turn going to be?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <node>792954</node>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:10:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard Mancine</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">792954 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
