<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/109568</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/906402</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, it&#039;s bad. But, whether it&#039;s bad or not, Microsoft isn&#039;t going to collapse over it. They&#039;re too rich and too entrenched -- they have income from too many sources, for that to happen. Even if they lost 50% DT OS marketshare, they wouldn&#039;t collapse. Maybe they would if they were a smaller company, without any business savvy. It might make them somewhat less relevant in the desktop operating system market -- but, that could actually be a good thing. The 800 pound gorilla could stand to lose some weight. It&#039;s become fat and lazy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:31:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Reagan Cardwell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">906402 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/837081</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think it was J.C. Watts (or perhaps he was quoting someone) that said: &quot;A person&#039;s character is determined by the things he does when no one is watching.&quot; I agree with that statement. I would add that any leader that is so corrupt, is of so poor character that they shouldn&#039;t be considered great, or a leader at all -- just someone who happened to be in a position of power and control. The reasons for corruption are undoubtedly many, but one would have to be a lack of good strong role models -- which creates a vicious circle, one in which our society currently seems to be caught up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/node/837081&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 07:17:01 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Reagan Cardwell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">837081 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/837041</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Innovation is fueled by new ideas. Whether those ideas were stolen or not, is actually irrelevant to the concept of innovation. Whether the innovation is incremental or a seachange is also irrelevant. Even a small, incremental innovation is still an innovation, even if it was someone else&#039;s idea. However, if you&#039;ve stolen some else&#039;s idea in order to implement an innovation, you&#039;re not an innovator -- that title belongs to the person who originated the idea that you&#039;ve implemented.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/node/837041&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 06:31:17 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Reagan Cardwell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">837041 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
