<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/107736</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/841112</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Start embracing change and innovative thinking!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 00:32:23 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Carl Lacey</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">841112 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/836480</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The only way this question could be answered yes, is if the person answering the question has identified the first primate to use tool is the sole victim.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:47:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Carl Lacey</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">836480 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/808127</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The answer to the question depends on several variables.  The first being what the job description entails for a person engaging in content distributions sites.  In my business, we are constantly looking at how others are using content to market and promote their company or brand.  So in my case, it would make absolutely no sense to restrict access to these sites.  Another variable that effects the answer is the employees capacity to balance the time they spend on these sites on company time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/node/808127&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:14:17 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Carl Lacey</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">808127 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/785321</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Any corporation’s primary objective is to be profitable to its share holders, and Apple is no different.  The difference with Apple is that they continue to bring out innovative products and services.  Apple also seems to resist the typical complacency that lands so many former heavy weights a knock out blow.  Apple has demonstrated a proficiency in building partnerships that, up to this point has improved the user experience.  If you are looking for an example of an industry taking advantage of customers, you need only examine the music industry before Apple’s involvement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/node/785321&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:55:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Carl Lacey</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">785321 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-729</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Physical media is dead!  Digital compression and quality are both improving exponentially, as is the ability to stream it both traditionally (cable), and wirelessly.  I understand that the quality is not there yet for the small percent of people who care about that over convenience  and price.  Just look at the 10-20% annual decline in annual compact disc sales, and you know exactly what the fate of the rest of physical media is doomed to.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 00:04:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Carl Lacey</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">775055 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
