<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/107214</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>xx</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-704</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I want to reinforce the other reactions -- how short-sighted to NOT include the visuals that are the basis of this article! I signed up after seeing this article in my copy of the magazine and wanted to email it to a friend who is a graphic facilitator. This format helps me not at all. Is this indicative of the online version of the magazine content? Count me out.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <node>770575</node>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:30:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rob Evans</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">770575 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
