<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/106643</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-657</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Turning around AOL was a task no one could accomplish, given the constant demands from the parent company to generate income growth to offset the performance of Time and other old media assets.  That tactic forced the company to obsess about mechanisms to prop up the dial-up cash cow, even as the tectonic plates of technology were shifting underneath them.  Did AOL, at some point over the last 5 years, have assets to exploit to shift to a new business model?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-657&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:23:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Media Maven</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">765745 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
