<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/105907</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-6173</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Any body creative in the third world ?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:22:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Charles Matovu</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1292826 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-6172</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Well in view of the current credit crunch the PR industry faces inevitable difficulty as companies tend to become rather conservative in business attitude.This may not be directly accepted but is verilly a factor herein.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:17:57 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Charles Matovu</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1292824 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-6171</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Well the much acclaimed credit crunch seems to indirectly change the whole purview of the PR industry, companies tend to become rather conservative one can opine .&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:12:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Charles Matovu</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1292823 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/845890</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;suBJECT TO FURTHER DEBATE ONE WOULD FEEL THERE CERTAIN FUNDAMENTALS OF ANY GOOD LEADER, THE ABC&#039;S , THERE SOME BLUE CHIPS&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 05:46:43 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Charles Matovu</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">845890 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/845889</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It may depend on the nature of undertaking , nevertheless in almost all cases of a down turn the no 1 remedy is to synergize. This is a time to bring out the best of your self, innovations in sales and marketing visavis innovations in cost cutbacks are the keys to turn around a business headed for the 4 sale column. Turning around a failing business requires overwhelming innovation, it is that idea that saves the enterprise , and the reason it usually takes a new brain is because it brings new innovation. INNOVATION IS EMPOWERMENT IN BUSINESS.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 05:42:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Charles Matovu</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">845889 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/845873</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There a few cases of individuals turning themselves around, infact most entrepreneurs have been molded by a mentor, culture or education they even copy other entrepreneurs in many cases ,why we think there born is because these instinctive skills in judgement that make a reasonable entrepreneur are developed at a tender age , it is at that tender age of a child that creativity, judgement and so on become an integral part of the individual, explaining why many think entrepreneurs are merely born.Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 05:34:55 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Charles Matovu</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">845873 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/831794</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for educating me Mr Gardner however ,trying to show the other side of the coin should not mean recommending basic economics philosophys and readings to a discussant, it implies the discussant is not learned in economics, i would rather you submitt arguements and quote such authorities as backups, nevertheless i do not agree with your submission that labour simply shifts in the free market, that is the problem with theory, it may be to the point intheory but in practice workers do not easily switch jobs, infact if research were conducted a big proportion of the work force are not conf&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/node/831794&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:26:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Charles Matovu</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">831794 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/830216</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The discussion is getting brilliant on the hour , a bystander would suppose in a free market system both parties to the bargain have fair freedom of choice, so why is it this freedom lacks in the American system, something must be wrong somewhere and perhaps it had better be adressed, simple as this appears, the discussion topic points to a fact that the free market the foregoing discussants praise will eventually need to be controlled otherwise the employer will hold the employee at ransom ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/node/830216&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:30:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Charles Matovu</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">830216 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/827274</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;My question underlying this discussion is not being adressed, could it be the free market system is exploitative where practiced most as evidenced in declining vacations ?Does this translate to the American employees facing harder times unless the free market is to some extent regulated ? some one through more light on these concerns to enable meaningful discussion.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 02:13:05 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Charles Matovu</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">827274 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fast Talk Response - </title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/node/825344</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Could it in a nutshell be an underlying fact that the American system is rather more exploitative as reflected in less vacation, Mr Gardner or other discussants are kindly requested to adress this school of thought without sentiment, nothing personal about the American system i must underline ...but are these indcators of an exploitative system ? If so, then the answer is as simple as that; thank you.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 03:18:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Charles Matovu</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">825344 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
