<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fastcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/member_recent_content/105886</link>
 <description>Member recent activity block for member profile page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Comment on Node  ant</title>
 <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-608</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;///Then there were the technology challenges. AOL&#039;s sites were written in a proprietary code, Rainman, that was incompatible with standard browsers and search engines. Ad servers couldn&#039;t read it either -- one reason ad revenues slumped from $2.6 billion in 2001 to $781 million in 2003. The company would have to invest a fortune in tech upgrades just to get to the starting gate.///&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is just pure BS. Which is perpetuates from an article to an article. The saddest part is that AOL execs believe that even today.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/comment/comment-node-ant-608&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:07:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Not Disclosed</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">759796 at http://www.fastcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
