Running a growth company means shifting your strategies from outmoded models of expansion to new ideas about customers and innovation. Here are a few of the required shifts.
| From... | To... |
|---|---|
| Viewing your business through a product lens | Studying customers through an economic lens |
| Creating growth based on traditional tools (products, factories, personnel) | Creating growth based on hidden assets (relationships, market position, information) |
| Thinking of company size as a growth inhibitor | Thinking of company size as a multiplier of opportunities |
| Worrying that marginal growth will cannibalize your base business | Building growth initiatives that reinforce and strengthen your base |
| Relying on blockbusters to revolutionize your market | Developing incremental moves based on structured creativity and operating discipline |
| Scrambling to eke out margin points in a world of diminishing opportunity | Expanding horizons to include an arena that is 5 to 10 times larger than your traditional market space |
(And Other Old-Style Growth Strategies)
Traditional growth strategies are as important as ever. But for most companies, old-style moves will replace revenue and profits lost to commoditization and increased competition rather than fuel overall growth.
After years of brand extensions, for example, most spin-off products are serving ever-smaller niche markets. Between 1980 and 1998, the number of annual new food-product SKUs in the United States grew fivefold, to nearly 11,000. Similarly daunting statistics could be cited for cars and CDs, books and cosmetics. In a world of utter saturation, is anyone waiting with great anticipation for your next product extension? Not likely.
That's why most product extensions are producing increasingly small returns in terms of growth, especially as a percentage of total revenue. And the bigger your company, the bigger the growth opportunities that you need.
Product enhancement is another depleted avenue for new growth. In most industries, product breakthroughs are increasingly rare. As a result, competition is reduced to back-and-forth jockeying. Think of Nintendo and Sony, Intel and AMD, Boeing and Airbus, Avis and Hertz. The advantages gained in this tit-for-tat combat are invariably slender and fleeting. And because meaningful breakthroughs have become rare, customers are extending their product-replacement cycles. If the newest car, copier, or computer is only marginally better than last year's model, customers can wait longer to replace it. Sales growth shrinks even further.
The end result of these and other traditional growth strategies? Companies and their executives work harder and harder to generate smaller and smaller benefits.
Adrian Slywotzky (adrian.slywotzky@mercermc.com) and Richard Wise (rick.wise@mercermc.com) are vice presidents of Mercer Management Consulting Inc. and authors (with Karl Weber) of How to Grow When Markets Don't (Warner Books, 2003), from which this article is adapted. Slywotzky's last cover story for Fast Company was "How Digital Are You?" (February:March 1999). For more on their thinking, visit the Web (www.demandinnovation.com).
Recent Comments | 2 Total
July 28, 2009 at 2:05pm by Jim Lanzalotto
I work with Q Analysts, a Santa Clara-based firm that has a 5-year CAGR of >100%. They've done a good job of vertical growth -- bringing in new offerings to existing customers. And they've added new customers with their current services. 09 is off to a good start, too. Up 56% in Q1. http://tinyurl.com/l2lgy8